<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Suggestion for Astrodienst</title>
	<atom:link href="http://horoscopicastrologyblog.com/2008/10/05/a-suggestion-for-astrodienst/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://horoscopicastrologyblog.com/2008/10/05/a-suggestion-for-astrodienst/</link>
	<description>The best astrology blog in the world.  Seriously.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:44:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Astro.com Unveils Two New Services &#124; The Horoscopic Astrology Blog</title>
		<link>http://horoscopicastrologyblog.com/2008/10/05/a-suggestion-for-astrodienst/comment-page-1/#comment-545</link>
		<dc:creator>Astro.com Unveils Two New Services &#124; The Horoscopic Astrology Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apotelesmatics.wordpress.com/?p=454#comment-545</guid>
		<description>[...] two new services/projects on their website, www.astro.com.  The first new thing is that they took my suggestion from a few weeks ago and started offering an option on their site to store more chart files for registered users.  For [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] two new services/projects on their website, <a href="http://www.astro.com. " rel="nofollow">http://www.astro.com. </a> The first new thing is that they took my suggestion from a few weeks ago and started offering an option on their site to store more chart files for registered users.  For [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Brennan</title>
		<link>http://horoscopicastrologyblog.com/2008/10/05/a-suggestion-for-astrodienst/comment-page-1/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Brennan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apotelesmatics.wordpress.com/?p=454#comment-442</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s great!   Thank you so much Alois!   I hope to see Astrodienst grow and thrive for many more years to come!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s great!   Thank you so much Alois!   I hope to see Astrodienst grow and thrive for many more years to come!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alois</title>
		<link>http://horoscopicastrologyblog.com/2008/10/05/a-suggestion-for-astrodienst/comment-page-1/#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>Alois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 08:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apotelesmatics.wordpress.com/?p=454#comment-438</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris, found this when I googled for Astrodienst Forum, because sometimes we like to know what is said about us outside of the own site.

We actually have done it, since about two weeks there is the option to subscribe to a 1000 chart limit.

I have taken the liberty to activate a free one in your account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris, found this when I googled for Astrodienst Forum, because sometimes we like to know what is said about us outside of the own site.</p>
<p>We actually have done it, since about two weeks there is the option to subscribe to a 1000 chart limit.</p>
<p>I have taken the liberty to activate a free one in your account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Brennan</title>
		<link>http://horoscopicastrologyblog.com/2008/10/05/a-suggestion-for-astrodienst/comment-page-1/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Brennan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 03:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apotelesmatics.wordpress.com/?p=454#comment-415</guid>
		<description>Exactly!  We are in complete agreement here.  Personally I would like to see Astrodienst retain its corner on the market by continuing to expand into these new fields, since they are such a great company and I owe them a great deal of gratitude.   I understand that overhauling the entire system may not be feasible at the moment though.   I guess that we will have to keep our fingers crossed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly!  We are in complete agreement here.  Personally I would like to see Astrodienst retain its corner on the market by continuing to expand into these new fields, since they are such a great company and I owe them a great deal of gratitude.   I understand that overhauling the entire system may not be feasible at the moment though.   I guess that we will have to keep our fingers crossed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whall</title>
		<link>http://horoscopicastrologyblog.com/2008/10/05/a-suggestion-for-astrodienst/comment-page-1/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>whall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 04:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apotelesmatics.wordpress.com/?p=454#comment-414</guid>
		<description>oh wow - I suggested this more than a year ago!  I&#039;m of the same mind - astro.com can make a great business doing a managed service for astrologers.  Everything goes managed service eventually - email, contact management, documents, social media, blogging... nothing is immune.

If astro.com doesn&#039;t do it, someone else will.  Who do you know would pay a yearly subscription to astrolabe or solarfire instead of purchasing it outright?  Most, I bet.  People can afford $50-100 a year much more easily than &gt; $500 one-time fee.

Updates, new features, added social items like comments, embedding, rss feeds, etc... all that is enabled with a managed service vs a paid software license.  You can even tier it out as free, basic, pro, elite... just like every other service out there.

SaaS - they should look it up and adhere to the coming efficiencies gained by employing Software as a Service.

I will comment on the thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh wow &#8211; I suggested this more than a year ago!  I&#8217;m of the same mind &#8211; astro.com can make a great business doing a managed service for astrologers.  Everything goes managed service eventually &#8211; email, contact management, documents, social media, blogging&#8230; nothing is immune.</p>
<p>If astro.com doesn&#8217;t do it, someone else will.  Who do you know would pay a yearly subscription to astrolabe or solarfire instead of purchasing it outright?  Most, I bet.  People can afford $50-100 a year much more easily than &gt; $500 one-time fee.</p>
<p>Updates, new features, added social items like comments, embedding, rss feeds, etc&#8230; all that is enabled with a managed service vs a paid software license.  You can even tier it out as free, basic, pro, elite&#8230; just like every other service out there.</p>
<p>SaaS &#8211; they should look it up and adhere to the coming efficiencies gained by employing Software as a Service.</p>
<p>I will comment on the thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
